You will see in other posts here, one way she was/has been manipulated to loose contact with me. I strongly suspect there would be more.

More importantly if she was spoken too, and given time to recall our long friendship, one would soon work out, it is a high possibility her statement had been altered as had another witness statement.

Ok back to the here and now. Remember the last remaining conviction held over me is said to have occurred at my home (when was never disclosed/established) and involves an elderly lady,  the same elderly lady, had not been at my home for some 11 or 12 years, if my math is correct. The only evidence is on a sample DVD which is a recording that is not my home  and does not exist in the original form as confirmed by a Judge.

Would you believe anything you read in a newspaper or what Police may say or present to the Court’s system?

Further, another long standing friend of mine was told by the same police officer who typed up the middle aged woman’s statement???? that I had been making movies of people having sex. Sorry guys, can’t find these anywhere either.

Ok I’m trying not to get angry as I type this crap. I believe this was a clear attempt to keep these people away from me, by manipulation.

As I write this, you all must realise, I have to keep a lot of actual names etc, out of this article due to ongoing legal actions I simply must take, if only to ensure the safety of our community from this type of thing happening to the less stronger and unsuspecting people out there.

My living room is like a glass house, if you come to my front door. (Remember I told you that my so called hidden camera could be seen from outside my home).

Ok that burning question I reckon most sane people would have had to ask by now.

Why the hell would I leave my video camera and dozens of old video tapes laying around for all to see, when I knew the boys in blue were coming to my home, if I was using my camera to do bad things.

COME ON LETS GET REAL HERE  ………

Do you still want to believe what you read in the newspapers, even the Courts section????

I have learnt that Newspapers are only permitted to make court reports public, which were either said or produced in evidence.

That was to show, there was no recording as alleged was taken in my living room, to exist in original evidence. Further, that sample DVD evidence known to have been edited was not of my home.

I had no idea what that lawyer had done until only a few months back.

He attended my appeal without me, up in Auckland.

There was absolutely no point for him to challenge laws as he appears to have done. Not for my benefit anyway.

I had intentionally sought out the BOP Times court report writer to ensure she was aware of this fact, yet was never reported to the public. Hmm wonder why???? Perhaps it may have gotten one of our wonderful boys in blue in trouble. Can’t have that could we.

In the above paragraph I refer to the 9 to 11 seconds long recording. With out realizing it, the high court judge who made such a wonderful detailing of this section also made clear reference to recordings either side of this  9 to 11 second recording where he clearly writes, I am wearing different clothes, there fore there is no suggestion of my setting up that situation. What he has not realised, this draws attention to a section of the actual video tape which has been edited in such a way that my poor old video camera could never do.  For you techno dudes, this video camera would always record at 25 frames per second, and could only ever produce recordings strictly at 25 frames per second, no matter when you stopped or started recording it would always be at 25 frames per second.  Only a professional old video tape editing suite could create  a recording such as I saw on that old piece of tape. The Police search of my home confirms I have/had no such  equipment (Which would be large and expensive  I suspect). Does anyone out  there know where such an editing sweet may be found????  Sarcasm again sorry.

And yes, there was a lot of missing footage I had on that old tape of my son which was important to me. If someone with experience in the field of recording with the old video tape systems, were to have looked at that recording, they would have easily worked out many segments of that tape which had been edited in a way my old camera could simply not have done.

Interested??? Keep checking back, there is so very much more you people out in the public need to know or at least be aware of:

It sure is fact, when they say you cant believe what you read in a newspaper. Based on my experience we cant believe or trust in the Police either.

Ok Found those very colourful articles about myself.

Well Guess what folks.

That first crime around the middle aged woman (my partner) did not exist anywhere, and is why it was discharged later by the high court. Bad enough I hear you say.

The remaining current conviction held over me,  was offered to be removed by Police if I pleaded guilty to the now discharged conviction around my partner.

For a few weeks my then lawyer had convinced me to plead guilty to the allegation with my partner, until I realised I had been suckered.

Much more concerning with regard to the now discharged conviction, is that during the original district court hearing, a letter was found on their files, written by the same lady, which was withdrawing her statement due to the content being altered or added without her knowledge. This was not spoken out loud in the court room, however, that letter was acknowledged as true, under oath by the same lady at that time. Findings of a high court judge many months later,  confirmed this ladies statement, which contained a very explicit sexual act, did not exist in actual evidence police had offered.  Someone had altered evidence.

I have always wondered that had that letter been spoken out loud, that all the charges created by police would have had to have been dropped there and then, & caused the Bay of Plenty times to write about the Tauranga police not following proper procedure, and of course the Judge and judicial system would not have looked to great either.

No that couldn’t be allowed to happen, easier to destroy one adult and a child’s life, than have that be known.

This last crime I am convicted of, which states, apparently I recorded on my old video camera, in my own living room (which means a power cord would have to be dragged around with me, due to camera  battery being long since dead) , images of an elderly lady.

Yep here we go again.

This was a long standing elderly friend who hadn’t been to my home since 1999 (approx 13 years prior).

Sample evidence, which is edited onto a DVD, does not exist in original evidence, and is confirmed in a High Court Judgement where by that Judge was the first to actually look at the original evidence and put into writing what he viewed. Which does not contain one single reference to the elderly lady.

Doesn’t stop here though. The sample DVD evidence does not contain any images,  movie or stills of my home inside or out, and was never disclosed by police what device was used to make those different recordings and where they were taken.

Although there may or may not be a connection, police did not disclose to the court, that they had in there possession, a faulty cell phone of mine which had not been used for over 5 months, due to it slipping into varying modes without warning. If there was a connection between the DVD evidence and the faulty cell phone, will never be known, as Police have destroyed all the digital cell phone memory devices, without specific permission from  the courts to do so, and without providing specific reason for their action.

Ok so how come the conviction remains you may say.

Damm good question I say.

I’ve tried all the logical and legal steps, (with legal costs being secured against my home) but to no avail. The last appeal court application should have been a simple matter, however it would appear the lawyer I used, was more interested in testing out the law, rather than doing what he was asked to do. That being to simply point out there is no original evidence or chain of evidence which supports the conviction held over me.

Now you are going to ask why was my camera there. Well first it had lived there for years as it had very little use due to it specialised batteries not holding a charge, and the need for power was only by 240 volt. Friends had seen it sitting there for perhaps a few years, (dust was still seen on the camera when Police took it.) simply as part of my many electronics which also lived in that cabinet. I use to sell video and tv’s etc in my own shop in prior years. My garage is full of old tv’s, camera’s ect and parts of computers, to this very day.

First up, this camera records onto the old VHS c format. This means the recording is on an actual tape. For the techo dudes out there, this means recordings have to be at 25 frames per second from these old video cameras. The police provided a so called expert to confirm such facts, which now only raise more questions than current answers as to how the hell any court could be so easily deceived. The only recordings at 25 frames per second do not contain the crime I am supposed to have committed. Sample evidence (supplied by police, onto a DVD disk) is as I seem to recall, at 50 frames per second, yet more important are not of my home, and was never established what device made those recordings.

So now, what did I use the camera for.

I had used the camera occasionally, to capture some behavioural concerns of my youngest son which has for many years not been acknowledged by his mother, but had been raised by my partner, some friends, and by my son’s school.  And later referred to the BOP DHB by his GP, for the same concerns, yet had been prevented to progress by the mother. ( Over recent months, I have accessed and continue to access Kindergarten, school and medical records which make clear reference to these behaviours existing and being documented for many years, yet never being assessed for. ) My son’s mum’s refusal to acknowledge his needs, are at the basis of everything I have endured for such a long long time.  I discussed all this with the police. Disturbingly when I later sought access to names of police who I had spoken to that day, a Judge (to be named later) refused this and other disclosure. Had this disclosure been approved, the other now discharged conviction regarding my partner would have never come to be in the first place. Nor would this last conviction held over me. I’ve been told the police are legally required to provide full disclosure! Apparently yet another law which can be manipulated by those working within in it and representing it. Oh dear guess this comment will get me in more trouble with the LAW BULLIES.

The camera was set up to capture my young son from head to toe, which the many recordings on that tape, was confirmed by a High court Judge who detailed those recordings into writing.

I admit, as printed in newspapers, a disturbed mind could see,  that adults seemed be appear mainly between mid waist and about the knee. But that would be a rather disturbed person, if it was first explained the reason for the need to capture behaviours of my son.

Finally for the first time ever, in 2014 I found enough money with the help of my eldest son to have my little boy privately assessed by a specialist in the field, and yes he is a young fellow in need of some special learning and life support, and would be expected to always have some unusual behaviours, however, now he can be better understood by all who work with him. There is (on his mothers side) an assessed history of family members with learning and behavioural disabilities. My son’s mum and extended family go by different Surnames.

Seems to me the legal system is protecting itself and our boys in blue who have much to answer for in this case.  At the ultimate expense of a child’s welfare.  As the actions of the justice system has had clear and negative implications for my little boy, which will impact on him well into adult life.